Final Project Process

The final project for this class was truly one of the most challenging experiences I have had in my graduate career.

The story–ultimately a profile piece of an entire community– was very ambitious. We tried to incorporate everything from video, print, mapping, and crowd sourcing from social networking. This project was the true essence of a converged newsroom.

The idea to do a response piece first came to me when I was walking around Devon Avenue, soon after the Faisal Shahzad incident. I was in a coffee house when I hear a heated argument going on about the responsibilities of a the Pakistani community in the concerns of terrorism.

The people engaged in the argument were passionate and convicted. And I just knew, that is what stories are made of. It seemed like a good fit, especially since Chicago has such a diverse population of not just Pakistanis, but Muslims as well.

I started to interview random people. I asked them what they thought, and they seemed willing to talk to me. Thus began a frenzy of interviews with Kristen’s new Nikon P90 camera.

We started out at Tahawwur Hussain Rana’s grocery store. And to my pleasant surprise, Rana’s father-in-law, Rana M. Ahktar, was willing to talk to us. He said a lot in fact. He told us he did not want to stay silent, against the advice of his attorney.

His testimony was compelling, but we wanted to stay focused on the story we had set out do: a Pakistani community response to all the terrorism links to their community.

So we talked to neighbors, raided the coffee houses.

And then Kristin decided she wanted to get an oil change because she no longer felt like paying for parking. (And she needed one too).

So we stopped at a car shop on Western Avenue. Turned out the guy working on Kristin’s car worked for Rana on his farm before he got arrested. Jackpot! His testimony was didn’t make the story, but it added some balance.

We met a part-time mechanic at the sop, who was also a Chicago police officer. He made some bold statements, and we loved it.

Putting the story together was a demanding process. I wanted to make sure that wasn’t one-sided. Being a Pakistani myself, I had to make sure I didn’t take anything for granted and that I stayed away from my opinion.

And the lede must have changed over 15 times–no exaggeration.

Alas, it is done and hopefully our readers will be able to take away something meaningful from the story.

Converge! Converge! Converge!

  As the chapter Converging with Other Emerging Media points out–convergence has moved beyond the website. In the evolution of user interface technologies and satellite ability, it’s pretty hard to be disconnected. 

 The chapter talks about five different convergence tools: RSS feeds, email, SMS or text messaging, electronic bill boards, and radio broadcast data service (RBDS). 

 First, RSS feeds–most commonly used by news and blogs sites, are meant to keep bringing the audience back to original sources (not to say that every other form of web communication isn’t doing that).  Clever RSS feeds customize for their customers, like the BBC, which lets you chose what country’s news feeds you want.  

 The author’s comparison of the email to our modern day delivery of news to our door steps is dead-on. But just like the real news papers piling up, this tool requires clean-up in the long run. The New York Times online has a good simple system of sending daily headlines with a little clip of the story (if you choose– you can also choose to get the whole story). 

 Text messages–while this is becoming trendier, I think it’s most likely the riskiest of the convergence tools, because in some respect, the owner is paying for it.  If a person has internet on their phone, then they can easily prescribe to emails and RSS feeds that are “free” and do the same thing (or even twitter). So they don’t need the text message. 

 On the other hand, SMSs for really specified information like the stock market or traffic updates right at 5 p.m. for a personal route home.  For example, Traffic.com  lets you customize your routes and will send you texts to your phone if there are traffic delays. Of course, if a tornado is coming through town and you get a text about it, you’re probably grateful also. 

 And then there are those sights that will down right converge to their inner core–providing all the services, all the time.  National Public Radio is the perfect example of one medium adapting to cater to all media convergence, including RBDS systems.

Photos from May 6th 2010 Threshold Relocation At O’Hare Airport

May 6th 2010

Airplanes getting ready for take off on new shortened Runway 10-C right around 6 a.m.

May 6th, 2010

Construction crew working away through the night to get the job done before 6:00 a.m.

Fresh green paint to mimic grass on previous safety area, after runway 10-C was shortened.

Analysis: Repurposing Content

News judgement is getting an upgrade.

The chapter From Broadcast to Internet: Repurposing Content in Principles of Convergent Journalism stresses yet again the importance of being a good storyteller, especially with the use of many different forms of technology.

But this now means knowing how to tell a story along with which story to tell.

The realm of broadcast already calls for many efficient decisions. With a new web-based platform, many more decisions need to be made.

Authors, Jeffrey S. Wilkinson, August E. Grant and Douglas J. Fisher define “repurposing” as the transformation each story takes for different mediums. The foundation of the story stays the same–same reporting, same rules.

Repurposing for the web, however, translates to interactivity for the news seeker.

The 2007 Murrow-Award winning  broadcast sites listed in this chapter as examples, demonstrate that interactivity can be as simple as taking a viewer poll. A large market radio station, KCBS-AM in San Francisco includes such a poll on their home page.

CNN takes things a little further by promoting citizen journalism and having their reporters blog about various issues. In this case, typical mundane stories are more appealing by providing options for a reader to participate, see what others are saying and take in supplemental information.

The reading also foreshadows in my opinion, a rather confusing future for radio news identities. With video images so readily available, why would one reduce access to audio only? Without getting into specifics, the authors state that there is a niche for that too.

After reading this chapter, the stress level for the aspiring journalist only increases, because it is obvious that  IT and software skills are a must.

There is no consistent universal language for video software just yet, but the authors claim that Flash is becoming that language with time.

So who’s teaching Flash???

Response to Princples of Convergent Journalism Reading

The Basics of Broadcasting chapter in Principles of Convergent Journalism makes it simply clear: it was only a matter of time before news producing mediums would merge.

With both the advantages and disadvantages of print and broadcast styles, something always lacks. In broadcast, stories are usually superficial and brief, but also can entail captivating or interesting images, (which people tend to respond to more). In contrast, print offers more depth, but lacks the immediacy and connection that broadcast usually offers.  Therefore, with the advent of web journalism, little room is left for longing.

Now news seekers have a choice. In one story they can watch or read, link to a related topic or another source, see what else is out there on the subject and have a complete experience in one sitting. These options are made available by the web, which ultimately translates to the dominance of converged news rooms.

 It is interesting to see all the different roles in a TV newsroom and a print news room.  With a converged newsroom, it is obvious that one person is taking on most of those roles—the most important being the producer.

 The concept known as “digital storytelling” is still a newbie. However after reading this chapter, it is clear what digital storytelling really means.  As the producer in a converged newsroom, one has to be creative as an editor, a producer, a photographer—everything as a storyteller. How a story is told is a key factor in current industry trends.  The more features and elements there are in a single story, the more likely it is to ultimately be successful.

 So while digital storytelling requires more tech savvy people, the chapter also emphasizes the importance of the same core journalistic values that are held high in all media.  I think the most important point this chapter makes, is because of blog mania and hyperlinks, projection of the core principles will be even more important for aspiring journalists.

Newser.com Poses as Future of Journalism

Reading the cliff notes version of Dante’s Inferno seemed like a good idea in high school. Cliff notes gave us the names of all the characters, the general plot and the different levels of hell. Yet, I never passed the tests because I always missed the important questions; the ones that dealt with character, style and personal perspective. I missed out on the true experience of hell.

Damn that Micheal Wolff –trying to invent Cliffs Notes “2.0,” the digital version.

If you hate reading developed stories from stylistic authors–then Newser.com is your new best friend.

But if you are like most news readers, then you’re probably annoyed with Wolff’s naïve comments on the uselessness of long-winded sources like the New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. His laborers and content editors will slave away at summarizing the main points of stories so that you don’t have to read the articles; you get an aggregate and some bare bones.

Aggregates like WindyCitizen.com make sense, because they are hyper local and reaching into specific niches and resources that get lost amidst the big ocean of information. But Newser.com seems overly ambitious.

And the obvious question to me is, WHY? The concept of print media dying out because of our involvement with the web is acceptable and inevitable. But why do we need to get rid of writers, researchers and the resources that make the entire art of journalism worth while?

As CNBC’s guest, Wolff claimed that it will be the aggregates’ jobs to determine what is worth while and useful. I thought the whole craze was about putting the power back in the hands of the people and pushing forth citizen journalism. Wolff is right, we are taking the power out of big names like the Wall Street Journal– and handing it over to the soon-to-be-power-house aggregates instead. THEY will determine what is worth while?

In a story taken from a UK wire about monkeys reacting to music, Newser.com  demonstrates the method used to summarize, with a synopsis and a tag line written by a Newser.com “writer.”  The author, in this case Rob Quinn, get accredited for reading the story and writing a simple summary for us.  His style: lazy.

The only accurate statement Wolff made in the entire interview was that advertising is moving away from traditional broadcast and gravitating mostly towards the web. So yes, print and TV better watch out on losing money.  All that will happen is that we will be inundated with ads on every click.

Dante’s Inferno will always be by Dante–not the publishing company that put out the cliffs notes version. And just like that, Newser.com will never be the future of  journalism.

2009 Series of Lincoln Park Muggings Connected

Recently, Lincoln Park–Home of DePaul University and other popular Chicago Dwellings had seven recorded muggings and assaults within several weeks of each other. At least 5 are confrimed by local Chicago Police as tied to the same perpetrators. Two of the last muggings are still under investigation, but police believe there is a link.

Click on the map below to see location and details. If you witnessed or have any information on these events, please reach out to the Lincoln Park Police Department.  

http://www.quikmaps.com/site/129562

FLYPmedia.com Innovating?

FLYPmedia.com is absolutely green. It is a paperless magazine—an expected future for all magazines. Instead of turning paper pages, now one can click the mouse so that animation can turn a pretend page for you. Stocked between stories are various images—but in this case the pictures move, either through flash or animation. Our brain has to do nothing except just watch and be impressed by fancy animation.

 According to Mike’s “10 Laws of Interactive Storytelling,” FLYPmedia is a solid example of exactly that– storytelling interactively with a reader. FLYPmedia allows you to read a magazine style story, adding elements of flash, animation and video to take it to the next level. If you’re not into all that jazz, you can read a text only format as well. The point is there’s a choice. And as Mike points out, it’s all about choosing the choice options.

If you don’t like to watch, and listening really gets your juices revved up then you also have the choice to download a podcast. FLYPmedia.com seems to offer many features to its users, but perhaps not a lot of original content. The most recent feature story on Jennifer Lopez has been taken from LATINA magazine and has been translated to FLYP’s language; offering animated page turns and audio bites. Right off the bat it feels like an aggregate site.

On face value, FLYPmedia.com is fascinating, but it has a long way to go as far as being truly diversified. As you read the feature articles, you can stop and watch the video instead (and then going back to the print seems redundant to me). In other words it’s like a magazine page imbedded with video. Nonetheless, an online magazine can flourish more with features like the New York Times story “Exonerated.” This format is an experience in itself. It is different. You still have your choices, but you can play with what it offers, and it offers a new way to digest a story.

We all know the blog feature is a must, at least right now. FLYPmedia has a blog element to it, but it is surprising that the blogs aren’t linked up with the stories they are featuring. In this case, while the blogs serve as their own “stories” or beats on the site, wouldn’t it make sense to link a blog entry or at least a feedback element? For example, CNN’s magazine style  story on living longer  includes print, video and the blog feedback element.

It seems like a must to generate more traffic to their site and to their good stories. Since hyper locally focused sites like GapersBlock.com are booming via “blog mentality,” (not to mention these sites keep it simply print for the most part)FLYP needs to bring that element also to flourish globally. I predict that will be their greatest challenge since their stories are so broad.

Only One Way for Journalists to Survive and Thrive

A pen and notepad just won’t cut it anymore. There are still notes to take—but they require at least a PDA phone, laptop, jump drive, quick shoot video cams and the list goes on! You need loads of gear, various coding, and many mediums— all to tell the same story in a few different ways. That’s what being a journalist in 2010 all is about.

The message in J-school classes is clear: get in line with online– or get out of the way. In Vadim Lavrusik’s article “Eight Must-have Traits of Tomorrow’s Journalist” the key to success for journalists is to embrace technology, social media, citizen-driven journalism and the ultimate entrepreneurial spirit. All this makes sense. Why wouldn’t accessible and constantly-updated news features be more appealing to the masses?

I predict that 2010 will be the year of many more “inventions” and innovations in the “dot-com” world, especially pertaining to the exchange of news information. This “duh” prediction is inspired by our own DePaul J-school graduate Craig Kanalley, and his creation of BreakingTweets.com. It’s the first of its kind—embracing social media, (Twitter) and reporting—the sexy lovechild of a press for the people, by the people and online media.

The one skill BreakingTweets necessitates that is not mentioned by Lavrusik, is the skill for digital editing and the ability to distinguish between garbage and authentic “good stuff.”

This is my fear: what will be the criteria for quality, in this marriage between media and sources? As is the concern in the birth of any new trend, how will integrity and responsibility truly hold? Who will I trust as my default go-to news website and why?

In ancient journalism, good writing and reporting separated the men from the boys. Good writing and reporting is still said to be the fundamental requirement to be a journalist—sounds like nostalgia to me. As Lavrusik points out, the new fundamentals require “…journalists who are jacks of all trades, yet still masters of one (or more).”

I surrender to the blog madness that has become this world.

« Older entries
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.